LVMH countersued Tiffany & Co on Monday, arguing the iconic U.S. jeweler’s financial mismanagement in the pandemic permits the French luxury goods giant to walk away from its proposed $16 billion (£12.46 billion) acquisition of the company.
The move comes after Tiffany sued LVMH earlier this month, objecting to the Paris-based company’s decision not to go through with the deal they signed in November because of a French government request and the impact of the coronavirus outbreak.
In its counterclaims filed in Delaware Chancery Court on Monday, LVMH said the agreement with Tiffany had no carve-out for pandemics under the definition of a so-called material adverse effect. As a result, Tiffany assumed the risk of a virus outbreak, LVMH added.
The French company also said Tiffany breached its agreement to operate as usual by paying out the highest possible dividend.
LVMH said it could not close the deal with Tiffany because it received a letter from the French government asking the conglomerate to delay the transaction until next year, beyond the Nov. 24 contractual deadline the companies had agreed to.
Tiffany did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It has disputed LVMH’s assertion that the French government intervention prevents it from closing the deal and that a material adverse effect had occurred. It also defended its ability to pay out dividends under its contract with LVMH.
LVMH also said Tiffany stands to profit “far more” if the deal proceeds than as a stand-alone company. Tiffany’s top five executives are in line to receive at least $100 million in total compensation if the deal moves forward, according to the counterclaims.
A U.S. judge last week set a four-day trial on the case beginning Jan. 5.
The judge said during a hearing he hoped Tiffany and LVMH could have “productive discussions to avoid the need for litigation,” referring to a potential settlement.
The letter that LVMH says prevents it from completing the deal was signed by France’s foreign minister, who said his office had received an inquiry from LVMH, and that it was natural for him to respond with advice.
LVMH in its counterclaim said the letter is a mandatory directive to take part in France’s efforts to defend its national interests in a trade dispute with the United States.
See all the news
Novartis Prostate Cancer Drug Receives U.S. FDA Breakthrough Designation
The Success of 5 Georgian Wines at Sommeliers Choice Awards 2021
სილამაზის ინდუსტრიის გამოწვევები და #AVON-ის ფინანსური მაჩვენებლები
Baia Kvitsiani to Replace Mariam Kvrivishvili In The Parliament
Who Is Vazil Hudak?
PM Appoints Vazil Hudak As A Special Advisor on Attracting FDI
Czech Development Agency Delegation to Visit Georgia
Georgia amends transfer pricing rules for APAs, reduces thresholds
We paid for 100% of shares of Caucasus Online in 2019 - NEQSOL Holding
“Only the courts have the right to determine the legality of the purchase of Caucasus Online", - NEQSOL Holding
Top-10 Major Commodity Groups by Exports – what does Georgia sell abroad?
NBG sold foreign exchange reserves of $ 993 mln in the last 12M
Nenskra HPP Project: Update
Carrefour Surpassed by Nikora in 2020
"ჯიპიაი" თავის დაზღვეულებს COVID ვაქცინაციას შესთავაზებს / ანალიტიკა - 12.03.2021-13:40 - გადაცემა სრულად
The former president of Frontera is accused by the founder of the company of stealing oil
The lawsuit between the former president of Frontera and the founder of the company
#ADB-ის პერსპექტივა - #ინტერვიუ შეინ როზენტალთან
"Severe punishment and termination of government support awaits you," Gakharia warns businesses